In my April 17 article, “Restore America or Build Back Better? It’s time to decide.”, I spoke about the first three steps of the 12-step plan to save Western Civilization. My intent in that article was to clearly state how critical it is to address these first three steps immediately, and that if we fail to do it, nothing else matters.
I explained that the three “Foundational steps” are like the old three-legged stool analogy, where the failure to address one of the steps, the legs of the stool, would result in the stool being unstable or unusable. Those three foundational steps, the legs of the stool, are:
Step 1: Restore our ability to communicate. Eliminate censorship. Restore our right to Free Speech.
Step 2: Reclaim the language. Restore the meaning of words to the author’s original intent in order to enable meaningful discourse to occur again in the age of Cancel Culture.
Step 3: Reveal the truth and reverse the effects that Postmodernism has had on people’s ability to understand what truth means.
After I published that article, I spoke to a few friends and found that, in general, people don’t know where to start , they don’t know what they can do, they don’t know how they can do anything of significance to resist or to alter the path we are on. People seem to be overwhelmed by everything that is happening today, and many have just completely tuned out. They assume things will just work themselves out – like they always do.
I started working on an article to help people understand what they could do in support of these three foundational steps, and I found it to be a pretty massive challenge if the goal is to really outline things that people can do. My plan was to come up with specific ideas to support the individual steps, and then to identify the people, or the people with the correct skillsets and networks, to address those steps.
I’ll get that article out before too much longer, but in the meantime, a YouTube video came to my attention that caused me to refocus temporarily. The content of this video speaks directly to Step 4: Expose the enemies of Western Civilization, and it covers some important information.
Who are “They”?
The video is from Mark Moss’s YouTube channel, and it features an interview with Whitney Webb1. Whitney Webb has several current books out on Amazon related to the Epstein case and other controversial topics, and she has much more content on her UnlimitedHangout.com2 website. If you haven’t seen her work before, you will surely find it impressive.
The main topic of the interview, at least what brought me to it, is the question about “Who is pulling the strings for the multiple, seemingly coordinated chaotic events happening around the world today?” I have been researching that very question for the last couple of years, more recently as part of the research for the “12-Steps to Save Western Civilization”.
From the YouTube video description:
Whitney Webb, a writer and researcher, sheds light on who the people at the top are that are pulling the strings and setting policies that push us into a digital prison. She goes in depth about the intelligence community, the banking system, and the ties between Jamie Dimon and Jeffrey Epstein. The conversation covers a variety of intriguing topics, including the distraction of culture wars, how the banking crises are being used to push us into a system of control, and how everything leads us to the exact same place!
As the video starts, Mark Moss lays out the objective of the interview:
Who are they at the top pulling the strings, what strings are they pulling, how everything that we see going on, the Culture War, the war with China, Russia, the US, all of that is a distraction that ultimately leads us all to the exact same place. How the banking crisis is being used to push us into a system of control, and so much other stuff.
The discussion turned to what many call the Deep State, or to the Administrative State, the Intelligence Community, or what some call “Deep politics’. Whitney explained:
“…once you go deeper and you really start interrogating power and power structures, you realize that what people have been told in terms of where power actually lies in the US is grossly inaccurate.”
She then explains her research process, and what she is trying to do:
“…what I try and show is that a lot of this so-called Deep State, this deeper power structure, is really borne out of an alliance between the intelligence community and organized crime…”
“And how it’s essentially gotten totally out of control over time because you have this particular powered access never being held accountable for anything, and consolidating more and more power.”
She traces the history back to several entities and various people, explaining how the process has unfolded over the last 50 years or more. Here are a few direct comments from the conversation:
“Samuel Pisar was telling Congress in the early 70s, he was talking about how the nation-state was becoming irrelevant, and there was the rise of what he called the “Trans-Ideological Corporation”, and that this was essentially a merging of private Western capitalist enterprises with communist state-run enterprises.”
“…this idea of consolidating power over the economic engines of the world under a specific block that makes the nation-state a national sovereignty completely irrelevant.”
“…it's pretty clear why they've been consolidating control over the banking sector the way they have been, and it's because we're entering a new paradigm where they're trying to essentially change what money is and what the economy is.
We're entering into this programmable money Paradigm where money isn't really money anymore. It's a control system.”
As the interview continues, she talks about the World Economic Forum, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Trilateral Commission, and others, and the talks about the role that these groups play today:
“…you have a lot of these interconnected groups, and these are the people that write the policies that are then that sort of then trickle down into National governments.
I would argue that a lot of the legislation and policies being implemented by national governments, and whether that's the legislative or executive branch in the United States, those policies come to lawmakers from these groups like the WEF, or the Carnegie Endowment, or the Trilateral Commission. And these entities essentially see governments as existing as what the UN refers to as ‘enabling environments’.
The power and role of the national government is an ‘enabling environment’ for policy drafted by these people that a lot of the time don't even live in the country where it's being implemented.”
She continued, explaining that:
“And that's how you get this policy framework where, when COVID-19 comes around, you have essentially every country, even if they're ostensible adversaries, operating in in lockstep essentially when it comes to COVID and biosecurity policy. It’s the same too with things like Central Bank Digital Currencies, the digital ID biometric Paradigm.”
Many other topics were discussed, far too many for me to cover individually in this quick article, but I wanted to put it out and urge readers to go and watch the entire video. I will post some other comments that I highlighted below, without further discussion, to give you a sense of the content that was covered:
“I think the culture war, to an extent, is to keep people divided and very busy while they implement what is essentially a control system masquerading as a financial system, over everybody.”
“…there's this ultimate goal of having your internet access, period, being tied to a government-issued ID, and that way they can know what you're watching, what you're reading, what you post on social media. There's a complete effort to surveil the digital world completely and have our entire lives onboarded onto the digital world at the same time.”
“…this is what the surveillance state is all about, because it's not just about finding the people that are breaking the arbitrary laws and restrictions on speech or finance that they're setting today, this is all about predicting who might do it in the future.”
“they are making a grab for complete control of everything, and they're not just gonna let people use alternative systems without trying to do something about it.”
“…it's very possible that they'll just take away major swaths of the Internet.”
“…the banking crisis is one way they're going to herd people into the CBDC digital dollar. But I think another way that's happening in a parallel fashion with the banking crisis, is the end of the dollar as the Global Reserve Currency. When the dollar stops being the Global Reserve Currency, it's very hard to isolate the American public from poor American monetary policy decisions.”
When the conversation turned to Elon Musk, who Whitney isn’t a fan, the subject was his vision for an “the everything app”:
“…Elon Musk was pretty open about saying that he wanted to make a WeChat equivalent.”
“…he wanted to create ‘the everything app’ and model it after WeChat…”
“’the everything app’ is basically this app that is necessary for digital ID to really function, and digital ID being the center of your life and the Fourth Industrial Revolution that's connected to everything you do, a centralized way of surveilling all of your activity, and so the agenda I mentioned earlier about tying your social media activity to a government issued ID, well Elon Musk is actually already rolling that out with Twitter Blue.”
“…whoever controls ‘the everything app’ in this Paradigm, you know the app you'll use for everything in this new digital ID Paradigm. Whoever controls that controls all of the data that generates. And in this new world, data is the new oil. And if you control the data of ‘the everything app’ you're essentially the Rockefeller of the data era that we're in right now.”
Elon Musk, a globalist, a transhumanist, as the “Rockefeller of the Data Era”… What could possibly go wrong?
The question about consolidation was discussed, whether it is in the banking sector or other industrial sectors. It was about having entire industries consolidated down into a few companies, like WalMart or Amazon killing off small, local businesses, for example:
“…frankly, I think the powers that be are interested in having only the options that they can control for the purposes they want to be the only game in town.”
“And these consolidation moves, in essentially every industry, whether it's banking or telecommunications, or whatever, the goal is to have very few corporations running specific sectors, and they're all on board with policy agendas, even if it flies in the face of the interest of shareholders.”
“Even if it flies in the face of the interest of shareholders.” Sounds like Bud Light and Fox News, doesn’t it? How else can you make sense of their actions, if they are not related to broader policy agendas?
Toward the end of the interview, Mark Moss asked Whitney what she thought would happen in the next 3, 5, or 10 years, and the tone became more ominous, with Whitney imploring listeners to pay attention to what is happening. She said a useful analogy to use is one of an abusive relationship:
“I think how far this agenda goes depends on all of us, and how many people are willing to take responsibility for their own lives…” “…the only way to stop that is to take the power back.”
“I guess an analogy that I think is helpful is to look at these entities like you're in an emotionally abusive relationship. People like that, emotional abusers, to keep you in the relationship, they'll use your best traits against you. They'll use your empathy against you, and that's why, for example, the selling points of a lot of these guys is, again, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.”
“So how do you deal with an emotionally abusive partner? You break up with them, and you leave them. And you make sure they don't have power over you, power over your finances mainly, but power over you in general.”
She warns:
“…this is a paradigm that we're entering into, that is complete and total slavery, maybe it won't start off seeming that bad but we have very few liberties, civil liberties left to lose.”
“This is an existential crisis if there ever was one, for the fate of humanity and the fate of human freedom.”
Regarding the transhumanist vision of the World Economic Forum, with the use of implantable surveillance devices or wearables, where the surveillance capabilities today capture what is happening external to our bodies to capabilities in the future where the data captured is internal to us:
“…once that happens it's a digital dictatorship from which people will never escape.”
“We have to face reality, and the reality is there is a major effort by an unaccountable Global entity, essentially, to enslave Humanity for the benefit of this this Top Tier. Create a neo-feudal society , where the people at the bottom, the serfs, are not only enslaved by technology, but their bodies are being modified, and their thoughts are being modified in real-time, by the elite.”
I may come back later and update this article, but for now I just wanted to get things out for people to see. And to urge them to go and watch this very important interview with Mark Moss and Whitney Webb.
And to wrap their heads around who the real enemies are.
Who Are “They” Pulling The Globalist Strings | Whitney Webb - YouTube
Unlimited Hangout, https://unlimitedhangout.com/